Skip to main content
· 1/31/1994

Marriage of Hodowal v. Hodowal

Citations

  • 627 N.E.2d 869
  • 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1500
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 38
  • 1994 WL 22547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Husband’s early retirement subsidy was nothing more than possible future retirement income and as a matter of law was not marital property at the time of separation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Sharpnack, Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.