Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/13/2007
Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC
Citations
- 161 P.3d 730
- 284 Kan. 476
- 2007 Kan. LEXIS 469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding error admitting purchase price of property subject to condemnation proceeding was harmless because award was within range of values given by experts, so sufficient evidence other than purchase price supported jury's award
- finding no abuse of discretion by district court's denial of continuance when party failed to demonstrate prejudice
- granting or denial of a continuance is discretionary in civil cases
- disallowing property owner’s testimony regarding prior sale or purchase price of subject property because that prior value was not sufficiently related in time and circumstance to be relevant to the question of fair market value at the time of taking
- discretion abused when comparable sales from 7 to 8 years earlier admitted
- discussing 26-508 in context of civil trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosen, Luckert, Beier, McFarland, Nuss, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Manhattan Ice & Cold Storage, Inc. v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-23· cited 31×
- Ben J. v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-06-05· cited 29×
- Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-12-23· cited 21×
- Estate of Kirkpatrick v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-09-04· cited 21×
- The Acquisition of Property by Eminent Domain, Unified School District No. 365 v. DieboltSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-03-21· cited 19×
- Kuxhausen v. Tillman Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-12-12· cited 12×
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-08-28· cited 10×
- Miller v. DeanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-04-14· cited 9×
- Miller v. PreisserSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-31· cited 4×
- In re HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-12-23
- Pener v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas· 2017-03-24
- State of Kansas, ex rel. KHP v. $28,350 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-01-10
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-10-27· cited 340×
- State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-10· cited 323×
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-04-27· cited 148×
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-10-27· cited 76×
- City of Mission Hills v. SextonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-22· cited 63×
- Miller v. BartleSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-02-02· cited 57×
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-02-03· cited 56×
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-06-08· cited 51×
- State v. LySupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-03-19· cited 50×
- Hill v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-01-23· cited 48×
- Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-03-07· cited 43×
- Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-05-14· cited 38×
- Love v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1944-04-19· cited 36×
- Griffin v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-12-09· cited 36×
- City of Wichita v. EisenringSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-07-14· cited 31×
- State v. 0.0673 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1966-11-23· cited 30×
- Bern-Shaw Ltd. Partnership v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-10-08· cited 29×
- State Highway Commission v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1971-05-15· cited 29×
- Board of Education, Unified School District No. 464 v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-01-13· cited 24×
- Willsey v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1981-07-17· cited 23×
Other cases named Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.