Skip to main content
· 7/14/2000

City of Wichita v. Eisenring

Citations

  • 7 P.3d 1248
  • 269 Kan. 767
  • 2000 Kan. LEXIS 618

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “any competent evidence bearing upon market value generally is admissible” in an eminent domain proceeding
  • presuming district court's decision was proper when City failed to furnish district court with pertinent rulings in record on appeal
  • “Considerable discretion is vested in the trial court in admitting or rejecting evidence of value.”
  • “The latitude accorded to the parties in bringing out collateral and cumulative facts to support value estimates is left largely to the discretion of the trial court.”
  • “ ‘Information acquired from others, though generally not admissible as an independent fact, may be sufficient to qualify an expert and to supply a partial basis for his opinion.’ ”
  • determining property value in a condemnation proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.