· 7/14/2000
City of Wichita v. Eisenring
Citations
- 7 P.3d 1248
- 269 Kan. 767
- 2000 Kan. LEXIS 618
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “any competent evidence bearing upon market value generally is admissible” in an eminent domain proceeding
- presuming district court's decision was proper when City failed to furnish district court with pertinent rulings in record on appeal
- “Considerable discretion is vested in the trial court in admitting or rejecting evidence of value.”
- “The latitude accorded to the parties in bringing out collateral and cumulative facts to support value estimates is left largely to the discretion of the trial court.”
- “ ‘Information acquired from others, though generally not admissible as an independent fact, may be sufficient to qualify an expert and to supply a partial basis for his opinion.’ ”
- determining property value in a condemnation proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.