Skip to main content

Miles v. State

Citations

  • 840 N.W.2d 195
  • 2013 WL 6492234
  • 2013 Minn. LEXIS 745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the district court properly rejected a claim of newly discovered evidence because the evidence was substantively inadmissible
  • stating that “[t]he postconviction court is in the best position to evaluate witness credibility”
  • stating that appellate courts defer to a district court’s credibility determinations
  • distinguishing newly-discovered-evidence exception to two-year time limit for filing postconviction-relief petition from postconviction claim for new trial based on newly discovered evidence
  • requiring deference to credibility determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gildea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.