Azure v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a Fourth Amendment claim was Knaffla -barred when petitioner knew, at the time of his direct appeal, that the State had obtained evidence pursuant to a search warrant and had presented that evidence at trial
• explaining that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal from denial of postconviction relief
• noting that “it is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal 4 from denial of postconviction relief”
• noting that “[i]t is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal from denial of postconviction relief” (quotation omitted)
• refusing to consider ineffective assistance claims because the allegations were mere argumentative assertions without factual support
• “It is well settled that a party may not raise issues for the first time on appeal from denial of postconviction relief.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).