Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “general expressions of ‘national policy’ ” in a federal statute were insufficient to preempt state law
• noting that because the taxed activity took place exclusively within Montana — although much of it on federal lands within the State — no nexus or apportionment problem existed
• noting that because the taxed activity took place exclusively within Montana — although much of it on federal lands within the State — no nexus or apportionment problem existed
• rejecting that general statements of national policy can demonstrate congressional intent to pre-empt state legislation that may have an adverse impact on attainment of that policy objective
• noting that review of challenges to state taxes under the Commerce Clause focuses on the \practical effect of a challenged tax\ (citation omitted)
• rejecting that- general statements of national policy can demonstrate congressional intent to pre-empt state legislation that may have an adverse impact on attainment of that policy objective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1980-12-08· cited 1×
• Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-23