Michaluk v. Burke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 2 property was separate property of a husband where he had equitable title to property 3 prior to his marriage but received the deed for the property during the marriage
• explaining that “[w]here the record on appeal is incomplete, the 4 ruling of the [district] court is presumed to be supported by the evidence”
• “Where 6 1 the record on appeal is incomplete, the ruling of the trial court is presumed to be 2 supported by the evidence.”
• “Where the record on appeal is 2 incomplete, the ruling of the trial court is presumed to be supported by the 3 evidence.”
• “[L]ump sum alimony [is] akin to accrued periodic alimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).