Thornton v. Gamble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judgment in a divorce proceeding 18 did not constitute a final, appealable order where “[t]he judgment specifically 19 contemplate[d] the entry of a further order”
• requiring that the docketing statement provide all relevant facts, including 5 those that are contrary to the appellant’s position
• stating that counsel must set out all relevant facts in the 16 docketing statement, including those facts supporting the district court’s decision
• stating that trial counsel must set out 20 all the facts in the docketing statement
• stating that the docketing statement must 16 set forth evidence that supports the lower court’s ruling
• stating that counsel must set out all relevant 17 facts in the docketing statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).