Cain v. Cain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he right to alimony under New Mexico case law is a continuation of the right to support and is personal and not a property right.”
• “The right to alimony under New Mexico case law is a continuation of the right to support and is personal and not a property right..”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of Garcia
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-03-04· cited 40×
• Michaluk v. Burke
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-19· cited 31×
• Mechem v. City of Santa Fe
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-10-05· cited 19×
• Dirks v. Dirks (In Re Dirks)
  D. New Mexico· 1981-12-04· cited 18×
• State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Davis
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-22· cited 14×
• Swinney v. Deming Board of Education
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-29· cited 13×
• Butcher v. City of Albuquerque
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-12-01· cited 11×
• Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Trinity Universal Insurance
  D. New Mexico· 2015-07-28· cited 8×
• In Re Wise
  D. Colorado· 2001-07-24· cited 5×
• Gordon v. Millette (In re Millette)
  D. New Hampshire· 2015-09-28

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Armstrong v. Armstrong
  California Supreme Court· 1976-01-28· cited 130×
• Cave v. Cave
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-09-14· cited 86×
• Corliss v. Corliss
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-05-17· cited 37×
• Morris v. Ross
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1954-06-14· cited 30×
• Szamocki v. Szamocki
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-04-30· cited 28×
• Kaminski v. Kaminski
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-06-10· cited 27×
• Hazelwood v. Hazelwood
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-11-15· cited 16×
• Marquez v. Marquez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-08-24· cited 11×