Deeds v. Deeds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Lump-sum alimony has been defined as the award of a definite sum of money[.]” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• applying the previous version of the spousal support statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rabie v. Ogaki
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-05· cited 23×
• Pruyn v. LAM
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-30· cited 6×
• Estate of Nauert v. Morgan-Nauert
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-02-23· cited 6×
• Rochester v. Rochester
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-06-11· cited 3×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Petersen v. Petersen
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-04-21· cited 148×
• Schroeder v. Schroeder
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-18· cited 44×
• Cummings v. Lockwood
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1958-07-09· cited 40×
• Benavidez v. Benavidez
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-03-22· cited 31×
• Michaluk v. Burke
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-19· cited 31×
• Banks v. Banks
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1976-08-11· cited 28×
• Turner v. Turner
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-04-06· cited 26×
• Foutz v. Foutz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-08-16· cited 25×
• Ball v. Ball
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1968-06-07· cited 16×
• Edgar v. Edgar
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1962-05-18· cited 13×
• Kishner v. Kishner
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1977-04-11· cited 12×
• Arnold v. Arnold
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-04-12· cited 8×
• Kulakowski v. Kulakowski
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-09-15· cited 8×
• Whitney v. Whitney
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1958-01-02· cited 6×