Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/18/2024

Meyer Kama v. Alejandro Mayorkas

Citations

  • 107 F.4th 1054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth elements of and burden-shifting framework for a Title VII retaliation claim and explaining how a plaintiff can establish pretext
  • noting cases where temporal proximity was sufficient to show pretext involved a period of “only a few days” between the protected 24 activity and adverse action, while usually being accompanied by other evidence of pretext
  • investigation may defeat any causal inference that might otherwise follow 26 from the temporal proximity between a plaintiff's protected activity and the termination of 27 his employment
  • a “five-month 11 gap” between plaintiff’s employment complaint and alleged 12 retaliatory action by employer “without more, places it at only 13 the outer bounds of relevance”
  • “Temporal proximity can support . . . a 16 prima facie case of retaliation[.]”
  • recounting the summary judgment standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.