Ninth Circuit· 7/18/2024
Meyer Kama v. Alejandro Mayorkas
Citations
- 107 F.4th 1054
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- setting forth elements of and burden-shifting framework for a Title VII retaliation claim and explaining how a plaintiff can establish pretext
- noting cases where temporal proximity was sufficient to show pretext involved a period of “only a few days” between the protected 24 activity and adverse action, while usually being accompanied by other evidence of pretext
- investigation may defeat any causal inference that might otherwise follow 26 from the temporal proximity between a plaintiff's protected activity and the termination of 27 his employment
- a “five-month 11 gap” between plaintiff’s employment complaint and alleged 12 retaliatory action by employer “without more, places it at only 13 the outer bounds of relevance”
- “Temporal proximity can support . . . a 16 prima facie case of retaliation[.]”
- recounting the summary judgment standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court· 2001-04-23· cited 3,456×
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeNinth Circuit· 2002-02-28· cited 1,272×
- William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralNinth Circuit· 2000-07-07· cited 707×
- Ronald Y. Chuang and Linda Chuang v. University of California Davis, Board of Trustees and Fitz-Roy CurryNinth Circuit· 2000-08-30· cited 665×
- George McGinest v. Gte Service Corp. Mike BiggsNinth Circuit· 2004-03-11· cited 529×
- Coszalter v. City of SalemNinth Circuit· 2003-02-18· cited 401×
- Cohen v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1982-09-08· cited 287×
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalNinth Circuit· 2011-01-10· cited 238×
- Hashimoto v. DaltonNinth Circuit· 1997-07-03· cited 201×
- Michael Curley v. City of North Las VegasNinth Circuit· 2014-12-02· cited 129×
- Joan Opara v. Janet YellenNinth Circuit· 2023-01-17· cited 72×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Boeing Co.Ninth Circuit· 2009-08-18· cited 67×
- Kalkines v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1973-02-16· cited 59×
- Field v. NapolitanoFirst Circuit· 2011-11-10· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.