Skip to main content
· 2/28/2002

Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard Hee

Citations

  • 281 F.3d 1054
  • 7 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1330
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2322
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3085
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,970
  • 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 387
  • 2002 WL 287698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that summary judgment was appropriate even where the 5 decision-maker’s reason is \foolish or trivial or even baseless\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding that plaintiff’s Title VII claim failed because she was unable to show that employer’s reason for termination was pretextual
  • Recognizing that “in some cases, causation can be inferred from timing alone where an adverse employment action follows on the heels of protected activity.”
  • holding that a year-and-a-half delay between protected activity and adverse 6 employment action, on its own, does not prove causation
  • holding that “[a] nearly 18-month lapse between protected activity and an adverse employment action is simply too long, by itself, to give rise to an inference of causation”
  • holding that a year-long gap between a protected activity and an adverse 4 employment action is “simply too long” to “give rise to an inference of causation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, O'Scannlain, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.