Skip to main content
· 4/11/2007

Meselsohn v. Lerman

Citations

  • 485 F. Supp. 2d 215
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27205
  • 2007 WL 1140385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the collection notice's demand for payment within the thirty-day period without any explanation that the consumer maintains the right to seek validation of the debt could confuse an unsophisticated consumer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.