Orenbuch v. Leopold, Gross, & Sommers, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing an FDCPA claim premised on an employer’s attempt to recollect over $2,000 as overpaid salary to an employee
• obligation to refund erroneously paid salary, due to accounting error, did not arise from a consumer transaction and therefore not a “debt” under the FDCPA
• salary overpaid as a result of accounting error is not a \debt\ within meaning of FDCPA because \there was no consumer transaction that gave rise to the debt\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).