Skip to main content

Merritt v. State

Citations

  • 785 A.2d 756
  • 367 Md. 17
  • 2001 Md. LEXIS 937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the circuit court erred in denying a motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence where the court denied the defendant’s motion without a hearing
  • rejecting theory that trial court’s ruling on new trial motion was unreviewable because it involved exercise of trial court discretion
  • discussing Washington, B. & A. Electric R. Co. v. Kimmey, 141 Md. 243, 118 A. 648 (1922)
  • “Commencing with this Court’s opinion in Wernsing . . ., however, we have consistently taken the position that denials of motions for new trials are reviewable on appeal and that discretionary rulings on such motions are subject to reversal where there is an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.