Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/7/1989
Yorke v. State
Citations
- 556 A.2d 230
- 315 Md. 578
- 1989 Md. LEXIS 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial under Rule 4-331(c) when it creates a “substantial or significant possibility” that “verdict of the trier of fact would have been affected”
- denial of a new trial motion is reviewable under an abuse of discretion standard
- the threshold for relief in Maryland is whether there is “a substantial or significant possibility that the verdict of the trier of fact would have been affected”
- the threshold for relief in Maryland is whether there is “a substantial or significant possibility that the verdict of the trier of fact would have been affected”
- “[T]he judge found that the newly discovered evidence, weighed with the evidence before the jury at the trial on the merits, did not affect the verdict to the extent that the outcome of the trial would be different.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Blackwell, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.