Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 10/5/2000
Mercier v. MidTexas Pipeline Co.
Citations
- 28 S.W.3d 712
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that pipeline indisputably \is not a common carrier” when it \does not transport gas or allow the dedication of its capacity to the public or anyone other than” the two corporate owners of the pipeline
- construing former articles 1435 and 1436 of the revised civil statutes
- construing former articles 1435 and 1436 of the revised civil statutes
- construing former articles 1435 and 1436 of the revised civil statutes
- construing former articles 1435 and 1436 of the revised civil statutes
- “When a statute delegating the power of eminent domain does not require proof of necessity the condemnor need only show that its board of directors determined that the taking was necessary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dorsey, Hinojosa, Rodriguez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-05-30· cited 154×
- Hubenak v. San Jacinto Gas Transmission Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2004-07-02· cited 123×
- Whittington v. City of AustinTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-09-30· cited 71×
- Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. and Mike Latta v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LlcTexas Supreme Court· 2012-03-02· cited 47×
- City of Corpus Christi v. TaylorTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-02-12· cited 41×
- In Re the Estate of RobinsonTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-08-19· cited 30×
- Missouri Department of Social Services, Children's Division v. S.V.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-10-14· cited 23×
- MidTexas Pipeline Co. v. DernehlTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-02-26· cited 17×
- Occidental Chemical Corporation v. ETC NGL Transport, LLCTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-07-20· cited 16×
- ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Harrison Interests, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-29· cited 14×
- Vardeman v. Mustang Pipeline Co.Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2001-03-22· cited 12×
- Cameron County Drainage District No. 5 v. Pablo S. Gonzales and Lucila E. GonzalesTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-02-21· cited 10×
- Interest of Cgcbg v. Dade County Juvenile OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-01-30· cited 8×
- Block House Municipal Utility District v. City of LeanderTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-07-10· cited 7×
- ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. BellTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-10-10· cited 4×
- Y.O. v. Barton County Juvenile OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-08-11· cited 1×
- ExxonMobil Pipeline Company v. William S. Bell, Ind., and as TrusteeTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-22
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-09-30
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-09-30
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-06-08
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Green International, Inc. v. SolisTexas Supreme Court· 1997-10-02· cited 865×
- Insurance Co. of North America v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court· 1998-07-14· cited 466×
- Hoggett v. BrownTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-09-04· cited 320×
- Housing Authority v. HigginbothamTexas Supreme Court· 1940-06-26· cited 256×
- McKinney v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court· 1989-06-07· cited 155×
- Burch v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court· 1975-01-29· cited 103×
- Coastal States Gas Producing Company v. PateTexas Supreme Court· 1958-02-12· cited 99×
- Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court· 1979-11-28· cited 80×
- Maher v. LasaterTexas Supreme Court· 1962-02-21· cited 76×
- Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-10-09· cited 61×
- Barraza v. KolibaTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1996-08-07· cited 54×
- Tenngasco Gas Gathering Co. v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-01-13· cited 49×
- Anderson v. Teco Pipeline Co.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-01-22· cited 49×
- Tate v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1997-10-02· cited 40×
- Hochheim Prairie Farm Mutual Insurance Ass'n v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-30· cited 34×
- Maberry v. Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1973-03-28· cited 33×
- Diana Rivera & Associates, P.C. v. CalvilloTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1999-04-01· cited 31×
- State v. SchmidtTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-03-08· cited 30×
- State v. HippCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-05-06· cited 30×
- Valero Eastex Pipeline Co. v. JarvisTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1999-05-11· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.