Vardeman v. Mustang Pipeline Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he same facts which established that Mustang was a common carrier also established that the proposed use of Mustang’s pipeline was for a public purpose.”
• \[T]he same facts which established that Mustang was a common carrier also established that the proposed use of Mustang's pipeline was for a public purpose.\
• \[T]he same facts which established that Mustang was a common carrier also established that the proposed use of Mustang's pipeline was for a public purpose.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).