Valero Eastex Pipeline Co. v. Jarvis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• looking only to former article 1436 of revised civil statutes, which contains no mention of necessity, as basis for pipeline company’s condemnation authority, yet ascertaining whether board determined that taking was necessary
• looking only to former article 1436 of revised civil statutes, which contains no mention of necessity, as basis for pipeline company’s condemnation authority, yet ascertaining whether board determined that taking was necessary
• looking only to former article 1436 of revised civil statutes, which contains no mention of necessity, as basis for pipeline company's condemnation authority, yet ascertaining whether board determined that taking was necessary
• looking only to former article 1436 of revised civil statutes, which contains no mention of necessity, as basis for pipeline company’s condemnation authority, yet ascertaining whether board determined that taking was necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).