Mendiola v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading from document during cross examination constitutes “use of a portion” of the document pursuant to rule 107
• reading from document during cross examination constitutes \use of a portion\ of the document pursuant to rule 107
• Rule 107’s purpose is to “correct any potentially misleading impression created when only a portion of evidence is introduced.”
• Rule 107 = s purpose is to A correct any potentially misleading impression created when only a portion of evidence is introduced . @
• Rule 107’s purpose is to “correct any potentially misleading impression created when only a portion of evidence is introduced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dennis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-01-18· cited 111×
• Crosby v. Minyard Food Stores, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-01-13· cited 26×
• DELAPAZ v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2009-09-24· cited 9×
• Charles Dennis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-07-07
• Frank Guerra Delapaz v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2009-09-24
• Jackie Ronald Green v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2009-01-30
• Orlando Dewan Godfrey v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-01-28
• Damien Guerrero v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-03-26
• Calvin Eugene Williams v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2010-10-28
• Erik Vasquez Trejo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-07-06
• Guerrero, Damien
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-22
• Entergy Texas, Inc.// Office of Public Utility Counsel and Public Utility Commission of Texas v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and Texas Industrial Energy Consumers// Office of Public Utility Counsel and Entergy Texas, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-06-02

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Montgomery v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-04-15· cited 1,896×
• Mitchell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-02· cited 515×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-07· cited 436×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-08· cited 294×
• Miller-El v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-01-17· cited 270×
• Grunsfeld v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-10-28· cited 267×
• Foster v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 225×
• Mendiola v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-06-21· cited 154×
• Saldivar v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-12-10· cited 131×
• Welch v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-04-14· cited 106×
• Grunsfeld v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-06-04· cited 82×
• Roman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-09· cited 61×
• Harris County District Attorney's Office v. M.G.G.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-12-02· cited 38×
• Texas Department of Public Safety v. Mendoza
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1997-07-23· cited 32×
• Mendiola v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-04-13· cited 21×
• Kendall v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1998-11-30· cited 16×
• Sunbury v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-11-22· cited 12×
• Metzger v. Houston Police Department
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-17· cited 11×
• Ex Parte Cathcart
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-08· cited 11×