MENDEZ
Citations
- 27 I. & N. Dec. 219
Syllabus
MENDEZ, 27 I&N Dec. 219 (BIA 2018) Misprision of felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4 (2006) is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude. Matter of Robles, 24 I&N Dec. 22 (BIA 2006), reaffirmed. Robles-Urrea v. Holder, 678 F.3d 702 (9th Cir. 2012), followed in jurisdiction only.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We have held that the categorical and modified categorical approaches provide the proper framework for determining whether a conviction is for a [CIMT].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court· 2013-04-23· cited 1,263×
- United States v. NevilsNinth Circuit· 2010-03-19· cited 609×
- United States v. Guillermo Novo Sampol, United States of America v. Alvin Ross Diaz, United States of America v. Ignacio Novo SampolD.C. Circuit· 1980-12-09· cited 283×
- United States v. Marvin GoldbergSixth Circuit· 1988-12-05· cited 220×
- United States v. Sylvia Vasquez-Chan, United States of America v. Julia Gaxiola-CastilloNinth Circuit· 1992-11-02· cited 164×
- United States v. Cindy Gabbard Adams, A/K/A Cindy SanchezFifth Circuit· 1992-05-08· cited 104×
- SOLONBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2007-07-01· cited 81×
- Abdul Itani v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2002-04-22· cited 78×
- Ali v. MukaseySeventh Circuit· 2008-04-04· cited 70×
- Ian Smalley v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralFifth Circuit· 2003-12-15· cited 68×
- Luis Fernando Padilla v. Alberto GonzalesSeventh Circuit· 2005-02-22· cited 63×
- Robles-Urrea v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2012-04-23· cited 53×
- ESPINOZABoard of Immigration Appeals· 1999-07-01· cited 53×
- Bratton v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1934-11-17· cited 44×
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Domenico Cefalu, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1996-06-04· cited 39×
- United States v. Curley KingNinth Circuit· 1968-10-25· cited 34×
- Mendez v. MukaseySecond Circuit· 2008-11-06· cited 30×
- United States Ex Rel. Medich v. BurmasterEighth Circuit· 1928-01-25· cited 28×
- Efstathiadis v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2014-05-20· cited 24×
- United States v. Leonel Salinas, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1992-03-04· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.