United States v. Marvin Goldberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s failure to inquire about or establish a clear factual basis for an element of the crime charged “reduced [the defendant’s] guilty plea to an unknowing plea.”
• noting that a delay of 55 days was the strongest factor supporting the district court’s denial
• finding a violation of Rule 11 because the district court did not establish a clear factual basis
• recognizing 55-day delay as lengthy and supported denial of motion to withdraw
• recognizing 55-day delay as lengthy and supported denial of motion to withdraw
• affirming a denial of a motion to withdraw where there was a “lengthy 55-day delay in filing the motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).