Robles-Urrea v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that assault with a 19 deadly weapon has been found not to involve moral turpitude
• holding that misprision of felony is not a CIMT
• declining to defer to the BIA at Chevron step two because it “entirely fails to explain why” its interpretation is reasonable
• noting that even a “sparse” explanation suffices
• “Such crimes are of two types: those involving fraud and those involving grave acts of baseness or depravity.”
• “In order to hold that the statute of conviction is overbroad, we must determine that there is a realistic probability of its application to conduct that falls beyond the scope of the generic federal offense.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).