Skip to main content
D. Arizona· 1/5/2016

Melendres v. Arpaio

Citations

  • 154 F. Supp. 3d 845
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 453
  • 2016 WL 51225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that laches could not bar a claim where the party “speculates that perhaps documents once existed [and] are now lost, but [the party] does not identify what documents are missing or how their loss has [caused] prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Snow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.