Skip to main content

Mears v. Mears

Citations

  • 337 S.E.2d 206
  • 287 S.C. 168
  • 1985 S.C. LEXIS 524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding timely service of the notice of intent to appeal is a jurisdictional requirement, and this Court has no authority to extend or expand the time in which the notice of intent to appeal must be served
  • stating the time for service of the notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement and the time for service may not be extended by an appellate court
  • interpreting former Supreme Court Rule 1, §§ 1 A and 1 C
  • timely service of the notice of intent to appeal is a jurisdictional requirement, and this Court has no authority to extend or expand the time in which the notice of intent to appeal must be served

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.