State v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting rulings on the admissibility of evidence are left to the trial court’s sound discretion and will not be disturbed absent clear abuse of that discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Oxner
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-01-24· cited 12×
• State v. Oglesby
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-07-07· cited 9×
• Horry County v. Parbel
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 3×
• State v. Cabrera-Pena
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 3×
• Maxwell v. Genez
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-06-03· cited 2×
• Hiott v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-11· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Weaverling
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-10-25· cited 60×
• Gamble v. International Paper Realty Corp.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-08-19· cited 58×
• Mears v. Mears
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-29· cited 32×
• Green Ex Rel. Green v. Lewis Truck Lines, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-04· cited 20×
• Witzig v. Witzig
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-12-09· cited 9×
• Eagles v. South Carolina National Bank
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 6×