Camp v. Camp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the particularity requirement of Rule 7(b)(1), SCRCP is to be read flexibly in light of the circumstances of each case and should not be applied in an overly technical fashion when doing so would not serve the purpose behind the rule
• finding appellant's motion for reconsideration did not violate Rule 7(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental Control
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-23· cited 57×
• Lucey v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-03-28· cited 7×
• Matthews v. VIKING ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-04-08· cited 4×
• Stanley v. C & R Asphalt, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2013-02-08· cited 2×
• Hill v. SOUTH CAROLINA DHEC
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-23
• Lemmons v. Macedonia Water Works, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-07-01
• W. Kenneth Swing v. Jill Swing
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2025-03-12

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Intera Corporation v. George Henderson III
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-11-10· cited 549×
• I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
• Calderon v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-07-06· cited 313×
• Elam v. South Carolina Department of Transportation
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-09-13· cited 287×
• James v. Talano, M.D. v. Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-12-10· cited 269×
• Martinez v. Trainor
  Seventh Circuit· 1977-04-25· cited 165×
• Allender v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-03-09· cited 149×
• Cambridge Plating Co. v. Napco, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1996-06-03· cited 106×
• Registration Control Systems, Inc. v. Compusystems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-12-20· cited 39×
• Mears v. Mears
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-29· cited 32×
• Ncatr v. Ncdot
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-06-05· cited 22×
• Dixie Lee Riley v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Doing Business as U.S. West Communications Don Buxton Judy Tinkham
  Eighth Circuit· 1993-08-13· cited 18×
• Schaan v. Magic City Beverage Co.
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-04-05· cited 13×
• Camp v. Camp
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-02· cited 4×