N.D. Illinois· 8/31/1982

McNichols v. Loeb Rhoades & Co.

Citations

97 F.R.D. 331
35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1407
1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a market maker is atypical of the class because “issues of both reliance and materiality would be different for a market maker”
finding that purported class representative’s potential reliance on oral misrepresentations by the defendant was a unique defense rendering action unsuitable for class certification
finding that purported class representative’s potential reliance on oral misrepresentations by the defendant was a unique defense rendering action unsuitable for class certification
on remand, denying class certification of fraud-on-the-market claim involving security not openly traded
on remand, denying class certification of fraud-on-the-market claim involving security not openly traded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Getzendanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.