S.D. New York· 1/14/1981
Kline v. Wolf
Citations
- 88 F.R.D. 696
- 31 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 354
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that question as to whether plaintiffs relied on company’s financial reports or market integrity “afford[s] defendants the opportunity to raise unique defenses, [and] unduly burdens the class by rendering plaintiffs’ claims atypical of the claims of all class members”
- class representative serves as fiduciary to advance and protect interests of those whom he purports to represent
- refusal to answer relevant questions as to whether plaintiff would have purchased shares had she known of information contained in Annual Report
- one plaintiff who relied solely on husband’s recommendation and another who was a speculative trader
- typicality not met where class representative in fraud on the market case is subject to defense that he did not rely on allegedly misleading financial statement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kline v. WolfSecond Circuit· 1983-03-11· cited 82×
- MacOmber v. Travelers Property & Casualty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-04-04· cited 59×
- Grossman v. Waste Management, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1984-02-06· cited 54×
- In Re Activision Securities LitigationN.D. California· 1985-11-04· cited 48×
- Seiler v. E.F. Hutton & Co.D. New Jersey· 1984-08-15· cited 47×
- McNichols v. Loeb Rhoades & Co.N.D. Illinois· 1982-08-31· cited 45×
- Weikel v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd.D. New Jersey· 1998-10-20· cited 40×
- Dubin v. MillerD. Colorado· 1990-07-16· cited 39×
- Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc.C.D. California· 2005-01-20· cited 38×
- In Re Gaming Lottery Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 1999-02-23· cited 35×
- Swack v. Credit Suisse First BostonD. Massachusetts· 2005-09-14· cited 35×
- Darvin v. International Harvester Co.S.D. New York· 1985-06-10· cited 34×
- Wagner v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1986-06-19· cited 31×
- Rocco v. Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.S.D. New York· 2007-08-21· cited 31×
- Panzirer v. WolfSecond Circuit· 1981-10-28· cited 30×
- Katz v. Comdisco, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1987-10-07· cited 29×
- Anderson v. Bank of South, N.A.M.D. Florida· 1987-11-16· cited 29×
- In re Ford Motor Co. Bronco II Product Liability LitigationE.D. Louisiana· 1997-02-27· cited 29×
- Shiring v. Tier Technologies, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2007-07-23· cited 28×
- Ross v. Bank South, N.A.Eleventh Circuit· 1988-02-17· cited 26×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Blackie v. BarrackNinth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 371×
- Pedro Gonzales v. Clifton W. Cassidy, Jr., John Richard Hayes, Iii, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-AppellantsFifth Circuit· 1973-02-15· cited 261×
- Elmo E. Koos, Sr. And Caroline M. Koos v. First National Bank of PeoriaFirst Circuit· 1974-05-17· cited 159×
- In re LTV Securities LitigationN.D. Texas· 1980-07-31· cited 113×
- Zenith Laboratories, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carter-Wallace, IncThird Circuit· 1976-02-10· cited 96×
- Greenspan v. BrasslerS.D. New York· 1978-02-14· cited 68×
- Weisman v. DarneilleS.D. New York· 1978-04-19· cited 38×
- Norman v. ARCS Equities Corp.S.D. New York· 1976-07-02· cited 33×
- Hernandez v. United Fire InsuranceN.D. Illinois· 1978-07-20· cited 31×
- Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp.S.D. New York· 1979-06-26· cited 22×
- Rossini v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc.S.D. New York· 1978-10-18· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.