Skip to main content
· 5/17/1974

Elmo E. Koos, Sr. And Caroline M. Koos v. First National Bank of Peoria

Citations

  • 496 F.2d 1162
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 996
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that typicality is defeated only when “a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff”
  • certification should be denied when the putative representative is subject to an unique defense
  • “Where it is predictable that a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff or a small subclass, then the named plaintiff is not a proper class representative.”
  • “Where it is predictable that a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff or a small subclass, then the named plaintiff is not a proper class representative.”
  • “Where it is predictable that a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff or a small subclass, then the named plaintiff is not a proper class representative.”
  • “Where it is predictable that a major focus of the litigation will be on an arguable defense unique to the named plaintiff or a small subclass, then the named plaintiff is not a proper class representative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Kiley, Cummings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.