· 8/28/1984
Zandman v. Joseph
Citations
- 102 F.R.D. 924
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24055
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prohibiting an attorney deposition where the information sought was either privileged or subject to the work product doctrine, and the attorney was not a party to the underlying transaction
- applying Shelton as an element test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.