Skip to main content
· 8/28/1984

Zandman v. Joseph

Citations

  • 102 F.R.D. 924
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prohibiting an attorney deposition where the information sought was either privileged or subject to the work product doctrine, and the attorney was not a party to the underlying transaction
  • applying Shelton as an element test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.