Skip to main content

Elliott v. Elliott

Citations

  • 867 So. 2d 1198
  • 2004 WL 399040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing in part because of trial court’s failure to “directly quantify the portion of the wife’s attorney’s fees incurred as a result of the husband’s purported misconduct”
  • remanding for additional findings due to “the failure of the trial court to directly quantify the portion of the wife’s attorney’s fees incurred as a result of the husband’s purported misconduct.”
  • remanding for the court to “articulate the precise nature and extent of the conduct it believes warrants an assessment of attorney’s fees under Rosen and its impact on the attorney’s fees incurred by the wife”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.