Clarence Ray Allen v. Steven W. Ornoski, Warden, of the California State Prison at San Quentin Attorney General of the State of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]hat the passage of time makes [Allen’s] Lackey claim stronger is irrelevant to ripeness, because the passage of time strengthens any Lackey claim.”
• § 2254(d)(1) “merely limits the source of clearly established law 16 that the Article III court may consider” and does not alter content of that law in violation 17 of Article III or separation of power principles
• § 2254(d)(1) “merely limits the source of clearly established law 7 that the Article III court may consider” and does not alter content of that law in violation 8 of Article III or separation of power principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).