Skip to main content

Dickson v. State

Citations

  • 533 N.E.2d 586
  • 1989 Ind. LEXIS 27
  • 1989 WL 7846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating post-conviction court may infer that trial counsel would not have corroborated petitioner’s allegations where trial counsel is not presented at the hearing
  • when trial counsel does not testify in post-conviction proceedings, the post-conviction court may infer that counsel would not corroborate petitioner’s allegations
  • “Where trial counsel is not presented in support, the post-conviction court may infer that trial counsel would not have corroborated appellant’s allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Givan, Pivarnik, Dickson, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.