McCullough v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 3.800(a) motion was facially sufficient because the motion “alleged that the error could be corrected based on record evidence”
• holding that rule 3.800(a) motion alleging improperly calculated scoresheet was cognizable because motion \alleged that the error [could] be determined from a review of [the] presentence investigation report contained in the court record\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tyson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-22· cited 5×
• Corey McClain v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-15· cited 4×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-01· cited 3×
• Russell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-18· cited 2×
• McCullough v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-18· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mancino
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-11· cited 282×
• Lomont v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-08· cited 40×
• Atwood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-07· cited 11×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-31· cited 3×