Lomont v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that only scoresheet errors which can be decided from the face of the record without an evidentiary hearing may be corrected pursuant to rule 3.800(a)
• holding that trial court properly denied defendant's motion asserting claim that prior felonies of which he was not convicted were improperly included in guidelines scoresheet computation because \the error complained of would require an evidentiary determination\
• noting that counsel’s failure to object to a scoresheet error may constitute ineffective assistance of counsel
• explaining that scoresheet errors in Whitfield and State v. Chaplin, 490 So.2d 52 (Fla.1986
• defendant foreclosed on motion for postconviction relief from raising scoresheet calculation error not apparent from face of scoresheet
• defendant's claim that he had only one prior felony conviction, rather than the three prior felony convictions referenced on his scoresheet, was not evident from the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).