Tyson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 3.800(a) motion “was facially insufficient because it did not ‘affirmatively allege[] that the court records [in the instant proceeding] demonstrate on their face an entitlement to th[e] relief sought.”
• explaining that generally a claim of this type may not be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion because it requires an evidentiary determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Corey McClain v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-15· cited 4×
• Livingston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-29· cited 3×
• Harper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-08· cited 2×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-11· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lomont v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-05-08· cited 40×
• McCullough v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-17· cited 5×