Fifth Circuit· 6/20/2003
McClure v. Ashcroft
Citations
- 335 F.3d 404
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12506
- 2003 WL 21418097
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that it is an abuse of discretion to “rel[y] on erroneous conclusions of law”
- “[O]nce the court has accepted the agreement, it may not subsequently reject or modify it.”
- “A district court abuses its 1 The two cases (summary judgment and attorneys’ fees
- explaining when a district court can modify a sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garwood, Smith, Barksdale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2008-10-10· cited 1,830×
- Ruth Bauer v. The State of Texas, the Presiding Judge of Probate Court Number 3 of Harris County, TexasFifth Circuit· 2003-08-18· cited 215×
- Willie Love v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2012-04-04· cited 140×
- Texas Democratic Party v. BenkiserFifth Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 129×
- Roark & Hardee LP v. City of AustinFifth Circuit· 2008-03-27· cited 122×
- United States v. OliverFifth Circuit· 2011-01-06· cited 101×
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantSixth Circuit· 2004-03-10· cited 100×
- Collins v. AinsworthFifth Circuit· 2004-08-20· cited 93×
- Helen Allen v. C & H Distributors, L.L.C.Fifth Circuit· 2015-12-23· cited 70×
- United States v. JonesFifth Circuit· 2011-12-15· cited 60×
- Shandell Bradley v. Louis AckalFifth Circuit· 2020-03-23· cited 49×
- In Re: Chamber of CommerceFifth Circuit· 2024-06-18· cited 31×
- Hendricks v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the City of GalesburgAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-10-01· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Abraham Linc. Corp. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2004-07-15· cited 25×
- Doe ex rel. Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish School BoardFifth Circuit· 2006-12-15· cited 25×
- United States v. SelfFifth Circuit· 2010-02-03· cited 21×
- Garcia v. USAFifth Circuit· 2021-01-19· cited 21×
- Ranolls v. DewlingE.D. Texas· 2016-09-22· cited 11×
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Fulcrum Enterprises, LLCS.D. Texas· 2014-05-19· cited 10×
- Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish School Bd.Fifth Circuit· 2006-12-15· cited 8×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-01-12· cited 4,651×
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 1,991×
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,682×
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 1,671×
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,450×
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1940-02-26· cited 1,204×
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court· 1973-03-05· cited 1,057×
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 962×
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackFifth Circuit· 1981-01-26· cited 516×
- Whitlow v. HodgesSupreme Court· 1976-12-13· cited 253×
- United States v. Ronald Scott PaulFifth Circuit· 2001-11-19· cited 238×
- Gilmore v. UtahSupreme Court· 1976-12-13· cited 198×
- Peterson v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court· 1963-05-20· cited 197×
- Peaches Entertainment Corp. v. Entertainment Repertoire Associates, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1995-08-16· cited 131×
- United States v. Michael Shane Phipps and Dean Rayburn GilleyFifth Circuit· 2003-01-15· cited 128×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.