Linda RS v. Richard D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no standing because the injury cannot be remedied by the relief sought
• holding that “a private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another”
• holding that a private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another
• holding that “a private citizen lacks a judicially cognizable interest in the prosecution or nonprosecution of another”
• concluding that the incentive created by the prospect of jail time was not sufficient to support finding that requested prosecution would result in the payment of child support
• finding that “appellant has failed to allege a sufficient nexus between her injury and the government action which she attacks” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).