Helen Allen v. C & H Distributors, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the doctrine may be invoked “’sua sponte’ and therefore ‘the court is not bound to accept a party’s apparent waiver of the doctrine’”
• explaining that the doctrine may be invoked “‘sua sponte’ and therefore ‘the court is not bound to accept a party’s apparent waiver of the doctrine’” (quoting 18 Moore’s Federal Practice § 134.34 (3d ed. 2015))
• explaining that the doctrine may be invoked \ 'sua sponte' and therefore 'the court is not bound to accept a party's apparent waiver of the doctrine' \ (quoting 18 Moore's Federal Practice § 134.34 (3d ed. 2015))
• omission of claim from bankruptcy filing is a representation that claim did not exist
• omission of claim from bankruptcy filing is a representation that claim did not exist
• “Chapter 13 debtors have a continuing obligation to disclose post-petition causes of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).