Kennedy v. Gibson
Citations
- 75 U.S. 498
- 19 L. Ed. 476
- 8 Wall. 498
- 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1127
Syllabus
<p>1. The 50th section of the National Bank Act of June 3d, 1864 (13 Stat. at Large, 116), which provides that suits under it, in which officers or agents of the United States are parties, shall be conducted by the district attorney of the district, is in so far but directory, that it cannot be set up by stockholders to defeat a suit brought against them by a receiver, under the act, 'which receiver, with the approval of the Treasury Department, and after the matter had been submitted to the Solicitor of the Treasury, had employed private counsel, by whom alone suit was conducted.</p> <p>2. Upon a bill filed under the 50th section of that act,' by a receiver, against the stockholders, where the bank fails to pay its notes, it is indispensable, that action on the part of the comptroller of the currency, touching the personal liability of the stockholders, precede the institution of any suit by the receiver, and the fact must be averred in the bill.</p> <p>8. It is no objection to such a bill properly filed against stockholders within the jurisdiction of the court, that stockholders named in the bill, and avetred in it to be without the jurisdiction, are not made co-defendants.</p> <p>4. Creditors of the bank are not proper parties to such a bill. The receiver . is the proper party to bring suit, whether at law or in equity.</p> <p>6. Suits may be brought' under the -57th section of the act, by any association, as well as against it; though the word “ by ” be omitted in the text of the section. Heading the section by the light of another section of a prior act, on the same general subject, the omission is to be regarded as an accidental one.</p>
Judges: Swayne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
214 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1931-05-25· cited 930×
- Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court· 1875-11-29· cited 277×
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court· 1877-03-26· cited 241×
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court· 1903-01-19· cited 215×
- Schoenthal v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 182×
- Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia· 1934-09-20· cited 173×
- McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court· 1905-03-06· cited 163×
- Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court· 1935-04-01· cited 142×
- Bushnell v. LelandSupreme Court· 1897-01-04· cited 119×
- Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 114×
- Adams v. NagleSupreme Court· 1938-03-28· cited 98×
- United States v. KnoxSupreme Court· 1880-12-20· cited 97×
- Christopher v. NorvellSupreme Court· 1906-04-02· cited 83×
- Forrest v. JackSupreme Court· 1935-02-04· cited 82×
- McDonald v. NebraskaEighth Circuit· 1900-03-19· cited 80×
- Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation v. Gus Blass Co.Eighth Circuit· 1945-07-31· cited 78×
- Hayden v. ThompsonEighth Circuit· 1895-12-09· cited 71×
- Pope v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1899-04-03· cited 68×
- Chauncey v. Dyke Bros.Eighth Circuit· 1902-11-28· cited 60×
- Studebaker v. PerrySupreme Court· 1902-02-24· cited 53×
Other cases named Kennedy v. Gibson
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.