Platt v. Wilmot
Citations
- 193 U.S. 602
- 24 S. Ct. 542
- 48 L. Ed. 809
- 1904 U.S. LEXIS 901
Syllabus
<p>The provisions of § 394 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure limiting the time within which an action may be brought against a director or stockholder of a moneyed corporation or banking association to recover a penalty or forfeiture imposed, or to enforce a liability created, by the common law or by statute, extends to actions against directors and stockholders of foreign corporations.</p> <p>Whether a foreign corporation is or is not a moneyed corporation within the meaning of § 394 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure will be determined for the purpose of construing the New York statute of limitations by reference to the meaning given to the term by the legislature and courts of New York rather than .of the State under whose laws the corporation is organized.</p> <p>Although the double liability of a stockholder of a moneyed corporation may be contractual in its nature if it is statutory in origin it is a liability created by statute within the meaning of § 394 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that contract liability arising under statute constitutes “liability created by statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peckham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 213×
- McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court· 1905-03-06· cited 163×
- Michelsen v. PenneySecond Circuit· 1943-03-19· cited 88×
- Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court· 1914-06-22· cited 67×
- United States v. Samuel Neidorf and Maria Glickman, of the Estate of Mannes n.glickmanNinth Circuit· 1975-08-04· cited 48×
- Lorenzetti v. American Trust Co.N.D. California· 1942-05-19· cited 28×
- Lewis v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1949-10-17· cited 27×
- Zellmer v. Acme Brewing Co.Ninth Circuit· 1950-10-31· cited 22×
- Cook v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-10-07· cited 20×
- Mitchell v. Banking Corporation of Mont.Montana Supreme Court· 1929-01-19· cited 16×
- White v. GovatosSuperior Court of Delaware· 1939-12-11· cited 15×
- Van Tuyl v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1916-11-03· cited 11×
- Anglo California National Bank v. KleinNew York Supreme Court· 1936-11-30· cited 10×
- Duncan v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia· 1921-12-13· cited 10×
- Todd v. RussellS.D. New York· 1932-11-02· cited 10×
- Schwartz v. Bann-Cor MortgageMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-05-09· cited 8×
- Ramsden v. GatelyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1906-01-16· cited 8×
- Richards v. CarpenterSixth Circuit· 1919-11-05· cited 8×
- Todd v. RussellSecond Circuit· 1939-05-08· cited 7×
- Whitman v. AtkinsonSecond Circuit· 1904-04-26· cited 7×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Platt v. Wilmot
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.