Prokopis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that challenge to jury instructions that stated that the jury is to be the judge of the law was waived because plain error review does not apply in post-conviction proceeding
• holding that challenge to jury instructions that stated that the jury is to be the judge of the law was waived because plain error review does not apply in post-conviction proceeding
• finding that by not raising the argument on appeal, petitioner waived his right to complain about the jury instructions in post conviction proceedings pursuant to Md.Code, Art. 27 § 645A(c)
• “Applicant acknowledges that Stevenson v. State ... is not retroactive.”
• \Applicant acknowledges that Stevenson v. State ... is not retroactive.\
• denying application for leave to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).