Federal Claims· 6/30/1997

McCauley v. States

Citations

38 Fed. Cl. 250
1997 U.S. Claims LEXIS 130
1997 WL 371092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court has no jurisdiction over claims for negligent or other wrongful conduct, or for breach of duty
rejecting a harassed employee’s claim that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission discriminated against her and breached a duty to accommodate her arising either out of an alleged “special relationship,” a statute, or language in the agency’s right- to-sue letter
“Jurisdiction to hear tort claims is exclusively granted to the United States District Courts under the Federal Tort Claims Act.”
“Jurisdiction to hear tort claims is exclusively granted to the United States District Courts under the Federal Tort Claims Act.”
“Plaintiff’s claims for monetary damages, which arise out of [the government’s] alleged negligent and wrongful conduct . . . are claims clearly sounding in tort.”
“It is well settled that this court does not have jurisdiction over civil rights claims brought under Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.