McCart v. H & R BLOCK, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “cooperative con duct [of husband and wife] amounted to mere subterfuge designed to avoid [wife’s] obligation under the [franchise agreement] contract”
• trans. denied as noted in Norlund v. Faust, 675 N.E.2d 1142, 1156 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997)
• contract provided for injunctive relief in addition to monetary damages
• summarizing the cases espousing this view

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).