Indiana Court of Appeals· 11/14/1984
McCart v. H & R BLOCK, INC.
Citations
- 470 N.E.2d 756
- 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 3039
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “cooperative con duct [of husband and wife] amounted to mere subterfuge designed to avoid [wife’s] obligation under the [franchise agreement] contract”
- trans. denied as noted in Norlund v. Faust, 675 N.E.2d 1142, 1156 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997)
- contract provided for injunctive relief in addition to monetary damages
- summarizing the cases espousing this view
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrard, Staton, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-04· cited 74×
- Kasco Services Corp. v. BensonUtah Supreme Court· 1992-03-31· cited 33×
- Fumo v. Medical Group of Michigan City, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-27· cited 33×
- Berger v. BergerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-03-22· cited 30×
- H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. v. Circle a Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2005-03-04· cited 27×
- Gold Messenger, Inc. v. McGuayColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-04-17· cited 26×
- Fogle v. ShahIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-06-19· cited 21×
- Kladis v. Nick's Patio, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-06· cited 14×
- Guttenberg v. EmeryD.C. Circuit· 2014-05-16· cited 13×
- JTH Tax, Inc. v. LeeE.D. Virginia· 2007-09-21· cited 12×
- Tantopia Franchising Co. v. West Coast Tans of Pa, LLCE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-01-22· cited 12×
- Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v. South Central Alabama Supply, LLCM.D. Alabama· 2001-12-14· cited 11×
- Pickett v. Pelican Service AssociatesIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-08-20· cited 10×
- Rollins v. American State BankIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-01-23· cited 9×
- Matter of UdellN.D. Indiana· 1992-09-17· cited 5×
- Ridgefield Park Transport v. UhlS.D. Indiana· 1992-10-15· cited 5×
- Grease Monkey International, Inc. v. Ralco Lubrication Services, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1998-10-09· cited 4×
- Guttenberg v. EmeryDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-16
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-05-31· cited 146×
- Jellibeans, Incorporated, a Georgia Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Skating Clubs of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, Cross-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1983-10-03· cited 144×
- Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court· 1955-06-20· cited 95×
- Bolz v. MyersMontana Supreme Court· 1982-09-14· cited 55×
- Victor Chemical Works v. IliffIllinois Supreme Court· 1921-10-22· cited 44×
- H & R BLOCK, INC. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-01-22· cited 42×
- Captain and Co., Inc. v. TowneIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-05-22· cited 34×
- Frederick v. Professional Building Maintenance Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1976-04-08· cited 32×
- Barrows v. McMurtry Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1913-01-15· cited 28×
- Tobin v. CodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-03-05· cited 27×
- 4408, INC. v. LosureIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-03-20· cited 26×
- Sulmonetti v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1964-04-30· cited 25×
- Chemical Fireproofing Corp. v. BronskaMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-08-24· cited 21×
- LeMaine v. SealsWashington Supreme Court· 1955-09-01· cited 20×
- Health Industries, Inc. v. European Health SpasD. South Dakota· 1980-05-12· cited 15×
- Arwell Division of Orkin Exterminating Co. v. KendrickAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-02-23· cited 13×
- American Family Insurance Group v. BlakeIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-09-21· cited 12×
- Wells v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1962-02-09· cited 12×
- Madison v. LaSeneWashington Supreme Court· 1954-04-09· cited 11×
- TEMPORARILY YOURS, ETC. v. Manpower, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-12-14· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.