Utah Supreme Court· 3/31/1992
Kasco Services Corp. v. Benson
Citations
- 831 P.2d 86
- 183 Utah Adv. Rep. 27
- 1992 Utah LEXIS 25
- 1992 WL 64546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- focusing on whether the moving party's delay was predicated on bad faith, as well as on the prejudice that would result from allowing the amendment
- receipt of notice of anticipatory repudiation is a question of fact
- upholding eighteen-month restrictive covenant running from date of termination
- denying permanent injunction to enforce expired non- compete
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howe, Hall, Zimmerman, Durham, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-02-04· cited 74×
- Smith v. Grand Canyon Expeditions Co.Utah Supreme Court· 2003-12-16· cited 41×
- Swan Creek Village Homeowners Ass'n v. WarneUtah Supreme Court· 2006-04-04· cited 40×
- Fishbaugh v. Utah Power & LightUtah Supreme Court· 1998-10-02· cited 34×
- Aquagen International, Inc. v. Calrae TrustUtah Supreme Court· 1998-09-04· cited 32×
- Andalex Resources, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-03-18· cited 30×
- Water & Energy Systems Technology, Inc. v. KeilUtah Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 19×
- Sulzen v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-11· cited 15×
- Graham v. Davis County Solid Waste Management & Energy Recovery Special Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-04-29· cited 15×
- Hunsaker v. KershUtah Supreme Court· 1999-11-23· cited 15×
- Anderson v. Larry H. Miller Communications Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah· 2015-05-29· cited 12×
- Miller v. Martineau Co., C.P.A.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-07-01· cited 11×
- Peterson v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-04-14· cited 10×
- Reller v. ArgenzianoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-09-17· cited 8×
- Swift Stop, Inc. v. WightCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-12-18· cited 7×
- Jessup v. Five Star FranchisingCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2022-07-08· cited 6×
- Cobabe v. StangerUtah Supreme Court· 1992-12-04· cited 4×
- Pero v. KnowldenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2014-09-18· cited 2×
- Olsen v. Fair Co.Court of Appeals of Utah· 2016-03-10· cited 2×
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Premium Oil Co.D. Utah· 2004-02-26
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hall v. BealsSupreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 608×
- Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-07-13· cited 248×
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 231×
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-09-01· cited 213×
- Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1977-10-18· cited 160×
- Johnson v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1975-09-23· cited 72×
- Roanoke Engineering Sales Co. v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Virginia· 1982-04-30· cited 64×
- Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court· 1963-05-01· cited 58×
- Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-03· cited 53×
- Bekins Bar v. Ranch v. HuthUtah Supreme Court· 1983-04-15· cited 51×
- West Shore Restaurant Corp. v. TurkSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-03-05· cited 49×
- System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court· 1983-08-08· cited 43×
- Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & SonUtah Supreme Court· 1991-03-22· cited 42×
- Rees v. Albertson's, Inc.Utah Supreme Court· 1978-11-02· cited 37×
- Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. WohlmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-04-10· cited 33×
- Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-23· cited 33×
- State v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 31×
- Allen v. Rose Park PharmacyUtah Supreme Court· 1951-11-19· cited 29×
- Robbins v. FinlayUtah Supreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 29×
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-09-24· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.