Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v. South Central Alabama Supply, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The substantive choice-of-law rules of the state in which the court sits are used to determine which state’s law applies.”
• held because Florida law on noncompete agreements was contrary to Alabama public policy, the choice of law provision would not stand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).