Gold Messenger, Inc. v. McGuay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a noncompete agreement was valid under two statutory exceptions, but not quoting the provision
• \What constitutes a trade secret is a question of fact[.]\
• upholding an injunction enforcing a non-compete covenant against a non-signatory
• “For a covenant not to compete to fit within the trade secret exception to § 8–2–113(2), the purpose of the covenant must be the protection of trade secrets, and the covenant must be reasonably limited in scope to the protection of those trade secrets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).