Colorado Court of Appeals· 4/17/1997
Gold Messenger, Inc. v. McGuay
Citations
- 937 P.2d 907
- 1997 Colo. App. LEXIS 94
- 1997 WL 183986
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a noncompete agreement was valid under two statutory exceptions, but not quoting the provision
- \What constitutes a trade secret is a question of fact[.]\
- upholding an injunction enforcing a non-compete covenant against a non-signatory
- “For a covenant not to compete to fit within the trade secret exception to § 8–2–113(2), the purpose of the covenant must be the protection of trade secrets, and the covenant must be reasonably limited in scope to the protection of those trade secrets.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davidson, Roy, Pierce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. ShidlerTenth Circuit· 2003-08-06· cited 74×
- King v. PA Consulting Group, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2007-05-08· cited 43×
- National Propane Corp. v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-06-22· cited 33×
- Weins v. SporlederSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-09-03· cited 25×
- Ovation Plumbing, Inc. v. FurtonColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-09-06· cited 25×
- Nutting v. RAM Southwest, Inc.D. Colorado· 2000-07-10· cited 21×
- Doubleclick Inc. v. PaikinD. Colorado· 2005-12-01· cited 15×
- Reed Mill & Lumber Co., Inc. v. JensenColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-02-15· cited 14×
- Wells Fargo Insurance Services USA, Inc. v. McQuateD. Colorado· 2016-08-02· cited 12×
- Harvey Barnett, Inc. v. ShidlerD. Colorado· 2001-04-16· cited 8×
- Great Am. Opportunities, Inc. v. KentD. Colorado· 2018-10-22· cited 8×
- Energex Enterprises, Inc. v. Anthony Doors, Inc.D. Colorado· 2003-03-06· cited 6×
- Act for Health v. Case Management Associates, Inc.E.D. Tennessee· 2014-03-17· cited 3×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rathke v. MacFarlaneSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-07-19· cited 92×
- Kodekey Electronics, Inc. v. The Mechanex CorporationTenth Circuit· 1973-10-11· cited 38×
- Klipfel v. NeillColorado Court of Appeals· 1972-02-15· cited 32×
- Porter Industries, Inc. v. HigginsColorado Court of Appeals· 1984-04-05· cited 28×
- McCart v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-11-14· cited 27×
- Management Recruiters of Boulder, Inc. v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals· 1988-09-01· cited 26×
- DBA Enterprises, Inc. v. FindlayColorado Court of Appeals· 1996-01-25· cited 23×
- Colorado Accounting MacHines, Inc. v. MergenthalerColorado Court of Appeals· 1980-03-27· cited 22×
- LeMaine v. SealsWashington Supreme Court· 1955-09-01· cited 20×
- Network Telecommunications, Inc. v. Boor-CrepeauColorado Court of Appeals· 1990-03-15· cited 17×
- Dad's Properties, Inc. v. LucasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-30· cited 13×
- Arwell Division of Orkin Exterminating Co. v. KendrickAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-02-23· cited 13×
- Littlehorn v. StratfordSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-11-15· cited 12×
- Madison v. LaSeneWashington Supreme Court· 1954-04-09· cited 11×
- The Day Companies, Inc. v. Claud T. Patat, Jr., John L. Farris and Patat Plywood CorporationFifth Circuit· 1971-04-16· cited 4×
- Bishop & Co. v. CuomoColorado Court of Appeals· 1990-08-30· cited 3×
- Johnson v. KruegerColorado Court of Appeals· 1975-07-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.