Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/9/2022
McAdoo v. McAdoo
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1550
Syllabus
A person may not be held in civil contempt if the prior court order was ambiguous. The determination of whether a prior order is ambiguous is reviewed de novo on appeal. If the trial court interprets an ambiguous order, the interpretation is subject to an abuse of discretion standard on appeal.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court· 1971-06-30· cited 287×
- Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 251×
- Burt v. DodgeOhio Supreme Court· 1992-10-21· cited 39×
- Frey v. FreyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-21· cited 22×
- Barton v. BartonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-17· cited 18×
- Whitman v. WhitmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-02-06· cited 10×
- Hall v. HallOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-10-04· cited 8×
- Schwieterman v. SchwietermanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-13· cited 8×
- Pelger v. PelgerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-08· cited 6×
- In re KuntzOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-07-06· cited 4×
- Landry v. LandryOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-17· cited 4×
- Meyer v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-12· cited 3×
- Deitz v. DeitzOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.