Barton v. Barton
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 980
Syllabus
The trial court had jurisdiction to consider a contempt hearing for failure to pay attorney fees, a motion for a withholding order for spousal support, and requests for attorney fees, even though Appellant's appeal from denial of his Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment was currently on appeal. The order to pay attorney fees was a valid order while in effect, and Appellant was clearly in contempt for refusing to pay fees as ordered. Contempt is also a collateral measure that may be considered unless a stay is issued. However, no stay was issued. In addition, the trial court had jurisdiction over the motion for a withholding order because the divorce decree did not reserve jurisdiction over spousal support. Trial courts lack jurisdiction to vacate or modify spousal support awards where a decree of divorce or dissolution fails to contain a reservation of jurisdiction to modify the award pursuant to R.C. 3105.18(E). Thus, while Civ.R. 60(B) allows motions for relief from judgment, Civ.R. 60(B) is a procedural rule and cannot supersede substantive law that controls whether trial courts have the ability to modify a periodic payment of spousal support. The trial court's decision on the motion for a withholding order, therefore, could not have possibly interfered with appellate consideration of Appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from the divorce judgment. Finally, requests for attorney fees were intertwined with these matters and the trial court did not lack jurisdiction to award attorney fees for bringing the motions. Regarding the remaining issues, res judicata bars most of Appellant's claims, and those that are not barred are without merit. The contempt order was well supported by the evidence. Appellant also was not entitled to have counsel appointed for the contempt hearing and was not deprived of due process. Appellant was advised of his rights, never contended in the trial court that he was indigent, and never asked to have counsel appointed. Appella
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Howard v. HCR Manorcare, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-23· cited 10×
- MRC Innovations, Inc. v. Lion Apparel, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-28· cited 5×
- Ackison v. GergleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-29· cited 5×
- In re E.A.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-01· cited 4×
- Lelak v. LelakOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-26· cited 3×
- Roberts v. FarrellOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-03· cited 3×
- McCloskey v. McCloskeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-17· cited 2×
- Branden v. BrandenOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-07· cited 1×
- Brown v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-07· cited 1×
- McAdoo v. McAdooOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-09· cited 1×
- Lelak v. LelakOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-30· cited 1×
- Janson v. JansonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-29· cited 1×
- Branden v. BrandenOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-20
- Barrow v. Living Word DaytonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-22
- State v. StargellOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-18
- Maanu v. BobieOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-02
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 1,323×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-26· cited 801×
- Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 440×
- Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court· 2004-05-05· cited 432×
- Turner v. RogersSupreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 409×
- Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 305×
- State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 292×
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court· 1976-06-23· cited 281×
- Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-12-27· cited 255×
- Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-31· cited 251×
- State ex rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-17· cited 216×
- City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51Ohio Supreme Court· 1973-07-18· cited 159×
- Zakany v. ZakanyOhio Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 121×
- State ex rel. Worcester v. DonnellonOhio Supreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 119×
- Mandelbaum v. MandelbaumOhio Supreme Court· 2009-03-24· cited 89×
- State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-16· cited 71×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2013-12-20· cited 64×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.